SaaS Comparison

Paylocity vs Oyster: Which is Better in 2026?

SaaS Battle

Paylocity vs Oyster: The Ultimate Comparison

In the ever-evolving landscape of HR and workforce management solutions, businesses are constantly seeking tools that not only streamline operations but also reduce costs. Two notable players in this arena are Paylocity and Oyster, each offering distinct advantages and features tailored to different organizational needs. While Paylocity excels in workforce management with its zero-cost structure, Oyster steps into the global arena with its comprehensive employment solutions, making it a powerful choice for international teams. Understanding their unique offerings can help businesses make informed decisions in maximizing their HR efficiency.

Businesses today are looking for more than just standard payroll systems; they want integrated solutions that cater to their specific challenges. Paylocity focuses on streamlining workforce management, empowering companies to handle employee tasks efficiently. On the other hand, Oyster is designed for those expanding beyond borders, simplifying global employment and compliance issues. In this article, we’ll delve deeper into the features and pricing of both platforms, helping you determine which solution aligns best with your organization’s needs.

Main Features Compared

Paylocity

  • Workforce Management: Paylocity provides a robust platform that includes tools for payroll, time tracking, and employee scheduling. Its user-friendly interface allows for easy access and management of employee data.
  • Integrations: The platform seamlessly integrates with various third-party applications, enhancing its utility for businesses that require compatibility with other software.
  • Employee Self-Service: Employees can manage their own records and schedules, promoting engagement and reducing the administrative burden on HR teams.

Oyster

  • Global Employment: Oyster stands out with its ability to employ individuals in various countries without the need for local entities. This feature is crucial for companies expanding internationally.
  • Compliance and Payroll: The platform ensures compliance with local laws and regulations, handling payroll and taxes in multiple jurisdictions efficiently.
  • Onboarding and Benefits: Oyster offers tailored onboarding experiences and employee benefits based on regional standards, making it easier for global teams to adapt.

Pricing Comparison

When considering pricing, Paylocity offers a unique proposition with no cost associated, while Oyster charges $399, reflecting its specialized global capabilities. Below is a detailed comparison of their pricing and features:

FeaturePaylocityOyster
Workforce ManagementYesNo
Global EmploymentNoYes
Integration CapabilitiesYesLimited
Compliance ManagementNoYes
Pricing$0$399/month
Employee Self-Service OptionsYesYes
Onboarding ServicesNoYes

The Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Choosing between Paylocity and Oyster ultimately depends on your business needs. If your organization prioritizes workforce management within a national context and seeks a cost-effective solution with no upfront fees, Paylocity is the ideal choice. However, for companies looking to establish a global presence while streamlining hiring and compliance across different countries, Oyster is the clear winner. Understanding your specific requirements will help guide you in selecting the most appropriate tool for your business growth strategy.