SaaS Comparison

Copper vs Close: Which is Better in 2026?

SaaS Battle

Copper vs Close: The Ultimate Comparison

In the world of customer relationship management (CRM) software, the choice between Copper and Close can significantly impact your business’s efficiency and sales outcomes. Both platforms offer unique features tailored to different types of users, making it essential to analyze what each solution brings to the table. This guide delves into the main features, pricing, and user suitability for both Copper and Close, helping you make an informed decision tailored to your business needs.

As businesses evolve, so do their CRM requirements. Copper, known for its seamless integration with Google Workspace, provides a user-friendly experience for teams that are heavily reliant on Google’s suite of tools. On the other hand, Close focuses on creating an inside sales-centric environment, putting a premium on communication and sales tracking. This comparison will help you explore which tool stands out for your specific objectives and operational style.

Main Features Compared

Copper

  • Google Workspace Integration: Copper excels with its deep integration with Google Workspace, allowing users to manage emails, calendars, and files effortlessly within the CRM platform.
  • User Interface: The platform boasts a clean and intuitive UI, making it easy for teams to transition to the system with minimal training.
  • Automation: Automating repetitive tasks is seamless, enabling teams to focus more on sales rather than administrative work.
  • Custom Fields: Users can create custom fields and records tailored to their specific needs, enhancing the CRM’s adaptability.

Close

  • Sales-Focused Features: Close offers powerful tools designed specifically for inside sales teams, including built-in calling and SMS capabilities for direct communication with prospects.
  • Reporting and Analytics: It provides advanced reporting features that allow teams to track performance metrics easily and optimize their sales processes.
  • Lead Management: Close allows for effective lead tracking and management, helping users prioritize high-potential leads based on interaction history.
  • Workflow Automation: Similar to Copper, Close offers automation features that help streamline tasks related to sales processes.

Pricing Comparison

When it comes to pricing, organizations must weigh the cost against the features that each platform delivers. Below is a comparison of their pricing structures:

FeatureCopperClose
Pricing$29/user/month$49/user/month
Main FeaturesGoogle Workspace CRMInside Sales CRM
IntegrationGoogle WorkspaceMulti-channel (calls, SMS)
AutomationYesYes
CustomizationHighModerate

The Verdict: Which One Should You Choose?

Ultimately, the choice between Copper and Close boils down to your specific needs. If your business thrives on collaboration within Google Workspace and requires a flexible, user-friendly CRM, Copper is the way to go, especially for teams that prioritize integration. However, if your focus is strictly on optimizing inside sales, with a need for robust communication tools and performance analytics, Close is a better fit despite the higher price point. Assess your team’s workflow and sales strategy to find the solution that aligns best with your objectives.